Natural-language reporting questions
Let users ask supported questions about approved measures and dimensions. Show the interpretation, period and filters so they can check whether the system answered the question they intended.
Data & decision intelligence
Make business reporting more accessible through connected data and AI-assisted exploration.
Business intelligence becomes frustrating when users know the question they want to ask but cannot find the right report or interpret conflicting measures. Natural-language interfaces can make exploration easier, yet they can also produce confident answers built on the wrong definition, filter or level of access.
We combine dependable reporting foundations with controlled AI-assisted analysis. Agreed business measures and authorised datasets form the starting point. The interface helps users ask questions, inspect the reasoning and trace results back to data, while making uncertainty and unavailable information clear.
Let users ask supported questions about approved measures and dimensions. Show the interpretation, period and filters so they can check whether the system answered the question they intended.
Surface contributing categories and relevant changes behind a movement in performance. Separate observed associations from causal explanations and link any narrative to the underlying figures.
Assist analysts with query drafts, measure documentation or report summaries. Keep reviewable intermediate outputs and protect the distinction between exploratory analysis and published organisational reporting.
Agree measures, dimensions and common terms with their owners. Resolve ambiguous language such as active customer, conversion or completed case before adding a conversational interface.
Create appropriately scoped datasets and stable calculations. Apply access restrictions in the data and application layers rather than expecting the language model to enforce permissions.
Ask clarifying questions where interpretations differ. Display selected measures, filters and time periods, with a clear route to the underlying table or chart.
Use approved query patterns or validated read-only access appropriate to the design. Bound query cost and output size, and reject unsupported operations or requests outside the user’s authority.
Test answer correctness, ambiguity handling and permissions against reviewed examples. Include missing data and misleading questions before opening the interface to a wider audience.
The sequence is tailored to the agreed scope, dependencies and risk. It describes our delivery approach, not a fixed timeline or performance guarantee.
The proposal identifies the deliverables, acceptance evidence, responsibilities and support arrangements included in your engagement.
Compare results with reviewed answers, including the interpretation of scope, filters and reporting period.
Assess whether ambiguous requests are resolved before the system presents an answer as definitive.
Measure the effort needed to obtain and verify an answer, including any analyst correction.
These are measures to discuss and baseline. Targets are agreed for the specific system and data; no universal improvement percentage is assumed.
The useful scope depends on available data, agreed definitions and permissions. We make those boundaries visible rather than implying that fluent conversation provides access to every organisational fact.
It complements them. Stable recurring decisions often benefit from a designed dashboard, while a conversational interface can help users investigate additional supported questions and understand a result.
The design should limit authority and resource use. We assess safer reporting datasets, approved patterns and query validation before considering open-ended generation, with permissions enforced outside the model.